<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DSpace Collection:</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/1880/45336</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 23:29:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2013-05-21T23:29:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>GROUP PERFORMANCE AND DISTRIBUTED REQUIREMENTS NEGOTIATIONS</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/1880/46631</link>
      <description>Title: GROUP PERFORMANCE AND DISTRIBUTED REQUIREMENTS NEGOTIATIONS
Authors: Herlea-Damian, Dana; Eberlein, Armin; Shaw, Mildred; Gaines, Brian
Abstract: In recent years, distributed development has become more and more common practice. As a result, investigations into the efficacy of distributed meeting systems in supporting group work in requirements engineering are needed. This paper reports on the results of a laboratory experiment in which video-conferencing and computer support were used in requirements negotiation. The study used a requirements negotiation task and compared the performance of local groups to those in four distributed configurations of the design team. Contrary to the belief that face-to-face contact increases performance, our findings suggest that groups in face-to-face meetings performed no better than the electronically mediated groups. Moreover, we identified a particular distributed group configuration that significantly improved performance across all distributed conditions and was qualitatively more conducive to requirements negotiation than face-to-face meetings. The results suggest that the electronic mediation reduced the transmission of socio-emotional cues in the interaction, thus enabling groups to have a more rational approach to conflict resolution in requirements engineering.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2000 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/1880/46631</guid>
      <dc:date>2000-03-22T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SURVEY OF KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/1880/45647</link>
      <description>Title: SURVEY OF KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES
Authors: Shaw, Mildred L.G.; Leighton, Hugh A.R.; Miller, Robert C.
Abstract: No Abstract</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 1990 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/1880/45647</guid>
      <dc:date>1990-11-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF FACILITATION OF COMPUTER-MEDIATED DISTRIBUTED 
REQUIREMENTS NEGOTIATIONS</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/1880/45646</link>
      <description>Title: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF FACILITATION OF COMPUTER-MEDIATED DISTRIBUTED 
REQUIREMENTS NEGOTIATIONS
Authors: Damian, Daniela; Eberlein, Armin; Woodward, Brian; Shaw, Mildred; Gaines, Brian
Abstract: Group facilitation is an important element of group approaches to 
Requirements Engineering (RE).  The facilitation in 'traditional' face-to-face 
groups is challenged by the increased globalization of the software industry.  
Thorough empirical investigation of human facilitation in computer-mediated 
requirements meetings is needed.  This paper presents findings about the 
facilitation of distributed group settings in a controlled environment.  Three 
professional facilitators mediate 15 three-person groups negotiating software 
requirements.  Facilitation in face-to-face meetings is contrasted with four 
group settings in which the facilitator is physically separated from the group 
or co-located with key stakeholders.  Rich qualitative and behavioral data 
enables an understanding of differences and similarities in the facilitation of
 the distributed groups and of aspects that were detrimental or beneficial to 
their facilitation.  The empirical evidence indicates a reduced richness of 
social behaviors in computer-mediated group settings which (1) made the group 
facilitation problematic but also (2) enabled certain facilitation support in 
the medium itself.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2001 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/1880/45646</guid>
      <dc:date>2001-03-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A MULTIDISCIPLINARY APPROACH TO THE STUDY OF DISTRIBUTED REQUIREMENTS 
NEGOTIATION</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/1880/45645</link>
      <description>Title: A MULTIDISCIPLINARY APPROACH TO THE STUDY OF DISTRIBUTED REQUIREMENTS 
NEGOTIATION
Authors: Herlea Damian, Daniela; Shaw, Mildred; Gaines, Brian
Abstract: This paper addresses requirements conflicts, their resolution 
through negotiation and the investigation of such processes in distributed 
communication settings.  It proposes a multi-disciplinary research approach to 
the study of distributed requirements negotiation.  This approach builds on 
'best practice' models in the research fields of requirements engineering, soft
 systems methodologies, study of groups with technology, negotiation behavior, 
group interaction analysis, and behavioral and social sciences.  Preliminary 
results of the implementation of this approach are presented and future work is
 discussed.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2000 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/1880/45645</guid>
      <dc:date>2000-08-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

